Author: Roberta Grimes

Hindsight

My mother married my father because she was pregnant. As an adult I thanked her for having gone ahead with the pregnancy and given me life, and she said, “You’re assuming I had a choice?” So I must admit to sharing the core aversion that many people have to abortion, but I am not avidly on large__7468312536either side of the issue. I only note that our culture has become an abortion culture, in which the disposal of fetuses has become an easy substitute for personal responsibility and common sense.

Reportedly, forty percent of pregnancies in the United States now end in abortion. Nearly thirty percent of American women will have had an abortion by the age of 45. In New York City, more than half the African-American children who are conceived are aborted. Just hold these statistics in your mind for a moment.

In the same way that you and I live in an abortion culture, Thomas and Martha Jefferson lived in a slaveholding culture. Both of them inherited slaves in a colony in which freeing them was illegal, and even in the colonies where blacks could live free, they suffered miserably as society’s dregs. That Jefferson detested slavery is abundantly clear from his contemporary writings. That he concluded that these slaves he was stuck with were better off in his care than sold of or freed seems sensible, especially given the fact that during his marriage – the period covered by My Thomas – he seems to have been hopeful that slavery could soon be ended.

A recent review of My Thomas has made me see our abortion statics in a new light. Of course, it is hard to put ourselves into the minds of those living in other cultures, but this tendency that some now have to judge slaveholders as irremediably evil and insist that those people should have known better makes me wince. This reviewer said:

“(Martha) is constantly surprised that their slaves don’t actually love them. She does come by the time of her death to outstrip Jefferson in his thinking of human rights, especially concerning slavery, yet she is never able to acknowledge even to herself that the children her slave Betty bore to her own father were, in fact, her half-siblings as much as the daughters of her two despised step-mothers.” (Here I disagree, of course. A non-judgmental read of the novel shows that the Hemingses were very much loved, which fact comes directly from historical records. )

How easy it is to judge the past! I am envisioning now a biography written in 2214 about a twenty-first-century hero who – I don’t know – won a Nobel Prize for having found a pill that prevents cancer while she simultaneously worked with UNESCO to end childhood hunger all over the world. She felt forced to have two abortions, one because she was still in college and the other because the fetus had Down Syndrome. Both were understandable and forgivable.

But unfortunately for our hero (let’s call her “Joy”), in 2173 abortions were outlawed worldwide because scientists had by then determined not only that fetuses feel pain, but that the recently-discovered human soul attaches to the fetus at conception. (Of course, by 2214 babies are desperately needed anyway, since in 2122 a cure for aging was found so now half the world’s population is over seventy and there is a desperate need for more young people to support them.)

What will Joy’s biographer say about her? How will her having done things for humanity’s health that are roughly comparable to what Thomas Jefferson did for humanity’s freedom stack up origin_4164575815against the fact that she not only lived in a barbaric abortion culture, but she herself had two abortions? I think you can read the above review – or read a host of contemporary comments about the fact that some Founding Fathers were slaveholders – and you already know the answer.

It is impossible for any of us to know how future people are going to judge us. I chose abortion for this illustration, but I could as easily have chosen America’s appalling prison system, the ways in which we sexualize our children’s lives, or the horrendous way in which our society has effectively cut off for so many people the possibility of economic advancement.  We don’t know what life will be like in two hundred years, so we don’t know for which of these things they will judge us. But one thing is certain. They will judge us!

As Jesus said, “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.” (MT 7:1-2). Keep that immortal wisdom in mind the next time you feel tempted to judge historical figures who were trying to make the most of their own very difficult times.

photo credit: <a href=”http://www.flickr.com/photos/donkeyhotey/7468312536/”>DonkeyHotey</a> via <a href=”http://photopin.com”>photopin</a> <a href=”http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/”>cc</a>

photo credit: <a href=”http://www.flickr.com/photos/renawgraphy/4164575815/”>bambibabe48</a> via <a href=”http://photopin.com”>photopin</a> <a href=”http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/”>cc</a>

Why Bad Things Happen to Good People

One of the questions that the afterlife evidence answers for us has long been a stumper. Why do bad things happen to good people? Atheists sometimes use the question as large_2280556593proof that there can be no loving God, while even those who are very religious will sometimes fret and question their beliefs as they try to answer it. But when we answer the question from the point of view of the afterlife evidence, we find that it all makes perfect sense. A lifetime on earth is just a hard day in school.

As is true whenever you research any real phenomenon, studying nearly 200 years of abundant and consistent communications from the dead shows us more than the fact that our minds are eternal and death is an easy, joyous passage. It gives us a lot of information about what the afterlife is like, and also – wonderfully – it tells us a lot about the meaning and purpose of human life.

Here is what we now know to be true:

1)    Human life is eternal, and an earth-lifetime is brief. If your life were not eternal, then for you to suffer a disabling injury or for your two-year-old to die would be an epic tragedy. As it is, even the most horrendous lifetime is only an eye-blink in the glorious eternity that is where you live.

2)    Our lifetimes on earth are opportunities for intensive spiritual growth. Spiritual growth is the core impulse of every human mind, but life in the Summerland levels is so easy that making spiritual progress there is difficult. Here, though, we can plan into our lifetimes lots of exercises in love and forgiveness that vastly improve our opportunities for spiritual advancement.

3)    Before we are born, nearly all of us write what amounts to a lesson plan. Few lifetimes are random! Together with those who will be significant in this lifetime and all our spiritual guides, we intensively plan the ways in which we will help one another with our spiritual growth.

            Your awful first husband? You and he probably planned both the marriage and the way it turned out. The auto accident that cost you your foot? Ditto. All your job issues? The way your child struggles in school? The swindler who took most of your money? The afterlife evidence tells us that very few accidents happen and few big events in our lives are random. We and our large_2967604762guides and those significant to us might make adjustments as our lives go on, but the afterlife evidence overwhelmingly tells us that you planned all the bad things that happen to you, and you eagerly planned them as spiritual lessons.

As A Course in Miracles tells us, everything that happens in our lives is either love or a call for love. Whatever the question, love is the answer. There are no real tragedies when every human mind is eternal, although our unwillingness to take every opportunity to better learn to love and forgive can indeed be tragic. As Jesus says,

“Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.”  (MT 5:39-41)

“You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment.” (MT 5:21)

“A new command I give you:  Love one another.  As I have loved you, so you must love one another.” – Jesus (JN 13:34)

No one said that spiritual growth would be easy! But it is the whole reason why bad things happen. When you love and forgive, no matter what happens, you can find yourself joyously learning and growing and you can much improve your own eternal life.

 photo credit: <a href=”http://www.flickr.com/photos/bernatcg/2280556593/”>bernat…</a> via <a href=”http://photopin.com”>photopin</a> <a href=”http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/”>cc</a>

photo credit: <a href=”http://www.flickr.com/photos/dhilung/2967604762/”>dhilung</a> via <a href=”http://photopin.com”>photopin</a> <a href=”http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/”>cc</a>

Something New in the World

My Thomas is about the American Revolution. It is a true story of the kind of love that few of us ever manage to find, and a carefully researched examination of the formative years of one of America’s Founding Fathers, but at its heart it is the tale of a group of people who mutually pledged “our Lives, our The Lexington Minute ManFortunes, and our sacred Honor” to the fight for their freedom. They risked it all.

It is difficult for us now to imagine what a new thing that fight for freedom was. The American Revolution was the first time in history that any colony had attempted to throw off its parent country, and the grievances on which the Revolution was based were by most standards slight. Those at the front of the fight – the young Jeffersons included – were proud to consider themselves to be Englishmen. So why did they risk their lives and everything they had to throw off what was such a modest yoke that two other British colonies – Canada and Australia – are still sort-of members of the British Commonwealth today? Why did the American Revolution happen?

I wondered about that more and more as I researched Thomas Jefferson’s early life and wrote My Thomas. The public words that Thomas speaks in the novel are from his contemporary writings, and as you read them you can see that at first he didn’t expect bloodshed. He saw the colonists as simply claiming their natural rights as Englishmen when they decided to throw off a relationship with England that they had outgrown. As the colonists begin to claim their rights, and as the parent country objects, you see the Revolution developing as a kind of colossal misunderstanding. More than once I wanted to tell them all just to sit around a table and work this out!

So on the surface the American Revolution might be seen as the result of an escalating series of affronts and responses, with each side indignant that the other is being unreasonable. But you realize as you read Thomas Jefferson’s early writings that it was always more than that.

The whole of Western history had been trending away from the collective and toward the individual for at least the past eighteen hundred years. Personally, I find the seed of British America’s desire for freedom in its Christian roots, and in the moment when Jesus first urged us to throw off religious origin_324380799authority and approach God directly: “But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.” (MT 6:6) When you are told that you don’t need religious masters, then the eventual realization that you don’t need secular overlords either is inevitable.

But freedom is not free. To quote Martha Jefferson in My Thomas, “Only those can be free who insist with their lives that they must be free.”

Ralph Waldo Emerson was asked to write a hymn to be sung at the dedication of the Revolutionary Battle Monument in Concord, Massachusetts, on July 4, 1837. I loved his Concord Hymn as a child, and even today it can make me teary.

Concord Hymn

By the rude bridge that arched the flood,

Their flag to April’s breeze unfurled,

Here once the embattled farmers stood

And fired the shot heard round the world.

The foe long since in silence slept;

Alike the conqueror silent sleeps;

And Time the ruined bridge has swept

Down the dark stream which seaward creeps.

On this green bank, by this soft stream,

We set today a votive stone;

That memory may their deed redeem,

When, like our sires, our sons are gone.

Spirit, that made those heroes dare

To die, and leave their children free,

Bid Time and Nature gently spare

The shaft we raise to them and thee.

Historical Revisionism

Christopher Columbus once ordered the simultaneous burning alive of a hundred Native American tribal leaders. The historian who mentioned this in a History Channel program awhile back tried to soften the shock of it by noting that “the fifteenth century was a barbaric age.”large_7730558908

There was a time when I would have shuddered and changed channels. Later on, I would have been comforted to know that people dying in pain are soon out of their bodies so their actual suffering is limited. Now, though, I hear about the burning of Native Americans by Christopher Columbus and I wonder whether it might be our fault.

The afterlife evidence tells us that reality is very different from what we perceive. Our senses and our prejudices lie to us, and we comfort ourselves by trusting a modern science that is equally senses-driven and prejudice-prone. In contravention of everything that mainstream science and your lying eyes tell you, here is what the afterlife evidence now tells us:

1)     Time is subjective, and it is not linear. If things are happening at all, then they are happening all at once.

2)    Matter and energy, time and space are holographic, which means that each unit (however you may measure it) contains all the information of every other unit.

3)     Matter and energy, time and space are mind-created. Universal Mind is their foundation, and each of us is an undivided snippet of that universal Mind. Another hologram. So our minds are more powerful than we can imagine.

4)    Mind-energy tremendously affects what we see as reality. Think of a horror movie in which when a hate-crazed actor arrives the castle starts to crumble, the peasants sicken, the grass withers and the skies cloud over. But then our loving hero comes back and that castle crisply reassembles itself, the peasants and grass recover, and the sun shines bright. Try to realize that this is something like the effect that our minds apparently have on our surroundings.

5)    All our lifetimes are happening simultaneously. Something like reincarnation does seem to happen, but it happens outside of time. More advanced beings tell us that as each of us makes or avoids making spiritual progress in this lifetime, we affect for good or ill all our other lives, past and future.

Please read this list again. Then multiply by every person on earth that insight that whatever we do in this lifetime affects every one of our past lives.

Temporarily trapped in this illusion as we are, we cannot really grasp what all of this means. But one thing that it may well mean is that we are not just the product of our history. We also may be the co-creators of it.

This puzzle has been on my mind for years, ever since I first began to wrestle with the time dilemma. The possibility that our modern evils are creating or worsening evils long past is both appalling and hard to grasp. But there seems to be no way out of it. The evidence is abundant, consistent, and incontrovertible to anyone with an open mind.

Imagine how all of this might be working. Stalin and Hitler, racial lynchings, and all the many evils of the twentieth century could have worsened the history that came before, created Biblical stonings and Medieval wars, perhaps turned Christopher Columbus’s capture of a few Native chieftains and sternly lecturing them into his burning one or two at the stake. And then ten.  And then a hundred. We would be none the wiser.

Now imagine that in this new century we begin to practice love and forgiveness within families, house to house, street to street, and then over all the earth. And gradually – imperceptibly at first – the world’s bloody history turns back to peaceful. Every book on every shelf in every library on earth records an ever gentler past, until all that evil never happened at all. 

It has long been thought that as modern humans migrated out of Africa, they conquered and destroyed the Neanderthal peoples that then inhabited what is now Europe. It turns out, though, that what they actually did was to assimilate Neanderthals as they moved north, so now everyone with European ancestry has Neanderthal genetic material.

18r5lc4ubwq1xjpg This wonderful picture was taken at the Neanderthal museum in Germany. It’s from a recent article that suggests that as much as 20% of the Neanderthal genome survives in modern humans.

It turns out that our earliest human ancestors made love, not war.

But somewhere along the way becoming “more civilized” seemed to be a good idea. We began the ongoing distortion of our own essentially loving natures that led erelong to the climactic evils of a cruel and bloody twentieth century. Now contemplate a hundred Native Americans screaming together as they burn, and the notion that their suffering could be the fruit of humankind’s later history. If you don’t want to learn to love and forgive perfectly for your own sake, then think about the possibility that you might be doing it for them.

It’s About Time

Part of the fun of doing afterlife research is the fact that as you put together many hundreds of afterlife communications received over nearly two centuries, you find that the dead are telling us remarkable things about the structure of reality itself.

The dead tell us that reality is energy-based. There is pretty strong evidence now that large_8382317948nothing is solid. As the great physicist, astronomer and mathematician Sir James Jeans once said, “The universe begins to look more like a great thought than a great machine.” All the levels of energy-based reality – including this one – exist in the same place, and they are separated from one another only by their different rates of vibration. So far, so good. The channels of your television set all exist in the same place as well, and that analogy makes it easier for us to imagine what actually happens at death. The dead tell us that when you die your mind will simply raise its own rate of vibration from this level of reality to the next, very much as you might change television channels, and there it will pick up a whole new solid reality! Dying is just that simple.

What seems to be even harder for most of us to grasp than the fact that there is no solid matter is the apparent fact that time and space also are subjective illusions. We are so dependent on the notion that space is spacious! In fact, with nothing beyond it, space is both infinite and tiny. Size is not one of its characteristics. We think it must be large because these temporary bodies that we believe we now occupy are infinitesimal in relation to it, but the dead tell us that they can travel instantly by mind across the entire universe.

And time is apparently also nothing like the arrow that we imagine it to be. Time is subjective, mind-created, and non-linear. As Albert Einstein said, “The only reason for time is so that everything doesn’t happen at once.” He also said, “The distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”

To further boggle your mind about time, I should add that there is considerable evidence that the following things are true:

1)    All our lives are happening at once. There is so much evidence that we live multiple lives that the concept of reincarnation cannot be denied by anyone who has examined the evidence, but rather than progressing from past to future, apparently all our lives are happening at the same time. Very rarely there will be moments of actual bleed-through from one of our lives to another. A very advanced being has suggested that the easiest way for us to understand reincarnation would be to imagine it as a bucket from which each lifetime is dipped and back into which each lifetime is poured.

2)    Future-life progression is as easy as is past-life regression. Dr. Brian Weiss pioneered techniques for hypnotically regressing people with phobias and other psychological problems to past lives in which some trauma had occurred, and he discovered that simply reliving that trauma could serve to cure the present-life psychological issue. Having been cured of a fear of heights this way, I can personally large_6827701945attest that his technique works well. Dr. Weiss then found that if there was no obvious source of problems in a past life, he could just as easily progress people under hypnosis to a future lifetime, and there he often found the causative trauma!

3)    History apparently is happening all at once. This is a natural corollary of the two previous points, and since time is not real it is probably inevitable. It may well be that all the aspects of what we think of as linear history actually are occurring simultaneously and intimately affecting one another.

So reality is not just stranger than we have been imagining it to be, but it is stranger than we can imagine it to be! Next week I will give you a boggling insight into what these facts about time might mean.

Tucson Festival of Books

Thank you to everyone who attended the Tucson Festival of Books this past weekend, “Celebrating Books, Authors and the Power of Stories.” A lovely time was had by all!

It was my pleasure to participate in three panels in Tucson, including What Next? After Your Book is Published with fellow panelists Patricia Barey and Therese Burson.

My fellow panelists on a panel about independent publishing, pictured below, are James Best, the author of wonderful Western novels, and Santino J. Rivera, whose beautiful book is on the cutting edge of Latino culture. Our moderator was my dear friend, Grael Norton, from the hybrid publisher Wheatmark, with which I expect to do a total of six books in 2014.

My third panel presented aspiring authors with the choice of whether to try for New York legacy publishing, or whether to go with self-publishing or hybrid indie publishing. Since I have tried all three options at various times, I had a lot of information to share. While once it was an easy choice – go with a legacy publisher if you can, or otherwise go indie and hope a legacy publisher will eventually pick you up – the world is changing with amazing speed. And the fact that nowadays to sell a book to a New York publisher means that it can be maintained as an ebook by them forever so you will almost certainly never get back those rights makes the choice even tougher. Nearly all novels published by legacy publishers soon go out of print, and the author doesn’t even control the price of that forever ebook: I met someone in Tucson whose legacy-published book is now just an ebook priced at $40 and therefore never purchased. I have taken back and reissued two novels that were published by Berkley and by Doubleday twenty years ago, and it saddens me to think that young writers who gamble on New York today will probably never have that privilege.

But everyone I spoke with loved the Festival! What a joyous experience it was. By some estimates there were 140,000 people in attendance, and I feel as if I got to meet and enjoy at least half of them during two absolutely beautiful spring days in Tucson. Arizona may be hot in summer, but there is no weather on earth more perfect than a spring day in the desert!

In addition to providing two unforgettable days each year where words and imagination truly come to life, the Tucson Festival of Books also supports literacy programs in Tucson and Southern Arizona. Since its launch in 2009, the Festival has contributed $900,000 to local literacy programs.

The Tucson Festival of Books is already on my calendar again for next year. I hope to have the chance to meet you there!

When Scientists Had Open Minds

One of the things that astounds me as I continue to study the afterlife is that there is so much evidence of what is going on, it is so widely available and so consistent, it melds so perfectly with mainstream scientific discoveries, it helps to explain so much… but still nearly all scientists want nothing to do with it. And this odd stonewalling has gone on for more than a century.

The reason why scientists are so obsessively incurious about the evidence that exists for an afterlife large_4052593758and a greater reality seems to be based in the millennia-long war of ideas between science and Christianity. Both sides seem to have decided long ago that reality must have been either created by God in seven days exactly as the Bible suggests, or sprung from nothing as a clockwork automaton that had no spiritual component whatsoever. This is an ancient, epic battle to the death with just one possible victor, despite the fact that there has long been abundant evidence that neither side has it right. The battle continues even today in the debate over whether “intelligent design” can be taught in schools as an alternative to a rigid version of Darwinian evolution lacking any epigenetic complexities that not even most scientists support.

The sad result of this self-imposed scientific blindness is that an open-minded investigation of the implications of quantum physics and what actually is going on has been stalled for more than a hundred years.

But it wasn’t always this way. In the latter part of the nineteenth century there was a glorious period soon after the founding of the British Society for Psychical Research (SPR) in 1882 when the leading lights in the field of afterlife research and some of the world’s greatest scientists were open-mindedly sharing ideas. I have just come across a blog post that includes a wonderful letter from Max Planck that I simply must share.

            Knowledge is nothing to be feared. How is it possible that this nonsense still continues today? Fortunately, the field of afterlife research has acquired some scientific muscle of its own, and I am confident now that within our lifetimes this pointless battling between science and Christianity over positions that were long ago outmoded is going to end in breakthrough discoveries that will be impossible for anyone to ignore. Meanwhile, it is good to know that once there was a time when mainstream scientists had open minds.

Finding Angels

One of the best things about my adventures in afterlife research has been the extraordinary people I have met. There is a small group of brilliant folks worldwide who have devoted themselves to trying to understand death, the afterlife, and the nature of reality, and my joy since publishing The Fun of Dying medium_2260513414has been meeting and befriending many of them. Foremost among these wonderful new friends is the ebullient and irrepressible Gary E. Schwartz, Ph.D., of the University of Arizona, who is one of very few scientists actually researching the afterlife in a university setting. My favorite of his books is The Afterlife Experiments, in which he proves by means of double- and triple-blind testing that some psychic mediums actually are in contact with the dead, but I have read most of his work and it is all wonderful.

When last summer my family more or less demanded that I stop traveling to talk about The Fun of Dying, I began instead to do a weekly internet radio show on the Contact Talk Radio Network that we’ve called Seek Reality because that is what we do: each week I interview a different guest as we chip away at trying to understand what actually is going on. All my past shows are available as free podcasts, so if you’re curious please have a listen.

My guest last Saturday for the third time was my delightful and brilliant friend, Gary Schwartz. I so much enjoy just being with Gary that it took a listener to point out to me the fact that Gary had “unloaded a mini-nuclear bomb” on my program.

Gary was talking about a series of current experiments with detecting photons of light inside a pitch-dark chamber. He had been inviting certain specific nonphysical entities to enter it, including his friend Susy Smith and her friend, Harry, both of whom produced what amounted to their individual light-signatures. But then two others entered the chamber who identified themselves as “Gabriel” and “Sophia” and claimed to be angels. And, sure enough: the light detected in Gary’s experimental chamber when either of the angels was present was vastly greater than what could be produced by any entity who once had been in a body. OMG, as they say. I don’t actually even really believe in angels. Gary, too, had long been a skeptic. But unlike so many who claim to be scientists, he follows his experimental results where they lead, and he told me during our visit that reluctantly he had to admit that, yes, there were very powerful entities who were apparently angels.

Dear friends, we live in exciting times! Gary’s work with light is part of his overall effort to produce what amounts to a telephone that will let us converse freely with our dead loved ones. The work is pretty far along in several laboratories worldwide. And that the Archangels Gabriel and Sophia have chosen now to involve themselves suggests that the time for a soul phone really has come!

Listening to Imperator

Having mentioned William Stainton Moses last week, I can’t resist sharing with you some thoughts about Imperator, who was the leading spirit to communicate with Moses and the core author of an extraordinary nineteenth-century book called Spirit Teachings.

In general, the century from about 1840 until 1940 was a heyday of frequent, comprehensive, and often highly evidential communications from people who were ostensibly dead but actually were more alive than ever in a greater reality that is more or less exactly where we are. There are reasons why this flood of good communications happened then and didn’t continue past mid-century, some of which reasons relate to the communicators and some to the receivers. But the important thing is that there were brilliant and often skeptical researchers with impeccable backgrounds and little reason to want to fool us involved in many of these communication episodes, and much of their work has been preserved.

Despite the debunker nonsense that you will find on Wikipedia and other websites that are desperate to keep you from knowing the truth, William Stainton Moses was a breathtakingly accurate and honest nineteenth-century medium. A clergyman by profession, he had a special facility with automatic writing, and a group of advanced beings chose to communicate through him during the 1870s. Their book, Spirit Teachings, is astonishing!  What the dead had to say in the 1870s about the greater reality, human nature, the message of Jesus, and life after death is so breathtakingly consistent with the more recent afterlife evidence that I am repeatedly blown away by it. The odds against chance for such detailed agreement are so small as to make coincidence impossible.

For example, Imperator (the nom de plume of Moses’s primary communicator) tells us that:

1)     The message of Jesus is substantially correct, but He and His mission are badly misunderstood because human inventions and distortions have substantially corrupted mainstream Christianity.

2)    God is perfect love, and any teachings that portray God as wrathful, petty, judgmental, or otherwise showing any human failings are in error.

3)    There is plenty of human evil, but there is no personified devil.

4)    Our life is eternal and we can never die, not even if we wish to die.

5)    Earth-life is a school. Beyond death, we have the privilege of making infinite further progress.

… and so on and on, for page after page, saying nothing that is not entirely consistent with the Gospels and with all the later evidence.

Imperator was a “red-letter Christian,” as was Thomas Jefferson. He confirmed for us from a place where it was possible for him to know what is true that the original words of Jesus in the Gospels are truth. Much of the rest of Christian theology is based in the Old Testament and in the well-meant letters of Paul, so it is sadly off-track.

What the spirits share with us in Spirit Teachings is unsurprising to anyone who has studied our nearly two hundred years of abundant and consistent communications from the dead. No surprises. But to have already put the evidence together and then to find it all precisely repeated in the formal prose of a book that was printed nearly a hundred and thirty years ago is incredible to me. And it is beyond wonderful! Imperator insists that the truth of the message of Jesus will soon be widely known. And if it seemed “soon” to him back then, by now it must be immediate.  It cannot happen soon enough!

Skeptics and Debunkers

Anyone who has done much afterlife research has encountered the work of skeptics and debunkers. Honest skeptics have contributed tremendously to the advancement of our understanding, but sadly most of those who claim to be writing as skeptics are just debunkers. You cannot learn a thing from a debunker, so it will be important that you know the difference!

Honest Skeptics

Skepticism is a healthy approach to dealing with extraordinary claims. Some of the greatest afterlife researchers began their careers as honest skeptics. From Ian Stevenson and Raymond Moody through Bruce Lipton, Helen Wambach and Gary Schwartz to Elisabeth Kubler-Ross and Bob Monroe, most of the best afterlife researchers were startled to discover some seeming anomaly. They were curious, and with an open-minded skepticism they set out to study that anomaly enough to be able to explain it and move on. Of course, the phenomena that they had paused to study turned out not to be anomalies at all, so none of them ever did move on. Today their wonderful work forms the basis of modern afterlife-related scholarship. Others, of course, have studied some phenomenon, been unconvinced, and said so. But no honest skeptic ever will attempt to mess with the evidence, or will consider his own view to be determinative of anything.

Debunkers

Skepticism in researching the afterlife is a healthy thing. But many purported skeptics now dealing with afterlife-related evidence are not operating as honest skeptics at all. They are operating instead as debunkers. When they encounter an afterlife-related phenomenon, their first reaction is not curiosity, but fear. The most common debunkers are scientists whose materialism-based careers might be at risk if reality turns out to be more complicated than what mainstream science long has supposed. Many of them are atheists as well. For them, debunking afterlife-related phenomena is a two-fer: not only can they protect their careers, but they can maybe also give God the boot!

Debunkers try to pass for honest skeptics, and it can be hard to tell them apart until you have some experience. To help you recognize debunker foolishness when you see it, here are four common debunker techniques:

1) They might choose what they think is a key aspect of some afterlife-related phenomenon and try to reproduce it under laboratory conditions, thereby in their minds proving that no supernatural explanation is necessary. In doing this, of course, they ignore whole swathes of other aspects of these phenomena which could not be so easily explained! But since they can (for example) produce tunnel vision and visual spots of light by whirling people in centrifuges, the whole well-documented phenomenon of NDEs is thereby “debunked” in their view. Someone conceivably could have opened the film-box that was on the table at Scole while a session was underway, so all the extraordinary photographic evidence which instantly appeared there must be ignored. Whenever a purported skeptical researcher focuses on just one aspect of a phenomenon, that is your cue to be skeptical of him.

2) They speak and write as if scientific hypotheses are the final word on something. As any good professional scientist knows, all scientific claims remain hypotheses. If that were not the case, then how could basic scientific advancements occur? Since all scientific claims are working hypotheses which can be revised or rebutted in the face of new information, when some “skeptic” claims to have the final word, you know he is no scientist.

3) They deny that some well-documented event actually happened. If they cannot find a way to debunk something, they simply say that it has been debunked and move on. Don’t let anyone try to tell you that any afterlife-related phenomenon has been debunked until you yourself have impartially examined all the evidence.

4) They refuse to consider bodies of afterlife-related evidence as a whole. It is in the very nature of afterlife-related phenomena that the evidence for them is extraordinary and usually highly subjective. In general, these phenomena are difficult to study and usually impossible to reproduce. You were the only witness to the appearance of your mother at the foot of your bed while she was dying half a world away? Good luck getting anyone to believe that!

5) They selectively lie. A strong word, true. They specialize in negative propaganda in areas where their lying cannot be balanced, so to do an internet search on any so-called paranormal phenomenon is to decide before the fact that you are not interested in an open-minded search for the truth. To give just one example, William Stainton Moses was arguable among the greatest natural mediums who ever lived, but yet if you attempt a Google search on his name you will learn that he is a thoroughly discredited impostor. He is not that. Check out a blog post by the venerable Michael Tymn for a more balanced view.

To honestly research the afterlife is to begin an extraordinary voyage! When I started doing afterlife research, I assumed that most of the purported afterlife communications that I was setting out to read would be nonsense. What I was looking for was a few bits of similarities among some of them, hoping that I could use those bits to get some idea of whether in fact there was an afterlife and what that afterlife was like. But in reading many hundreds of communications from the dead received over nearly 200 years, I found no outliers whatsoever and I cannot recall finding one duplication. Sure, if you look at one afterlife communication, it might have been faked. But, hundreds? And they all perfectly agree? The odds against chance for such a finding are so long as to be nearly incalculable. Personally, I find this amazing result to be my own surest evidence that all of this is real. Debunkers, however, generally insist on dealing with each event individually.

Everything that a debunker says or writes is fear-based propaganda. Ignore it! Instead, concentrate on reading honest skeptics’ original research, and draw your own conclusions.