Posted by Roberta Grimes • February 21, 2026 • 3 Comments
Quantum Physics, Understanding Reality
What’s it all about, Alfie?
Is it just for the moment we live?
What’s it all about when you sort it out, Alfie?
Are we meant to take more than we give?
Or are we meant to be kind?
And if only fools are kind, Alfie,
Then I guess it is wise to be cruel.
And if life belongs only to the strong, Alfie,
What will you lend on an old golden rule?
As sure as I believe there’s a heaven above, Alfie,
I know there’s something much more.
Something even non-believers can believe in.
– Burt Bacharach (1928-2023) & Hal David (1921-2012), from “Alfie” (1966)
My Thomas and I keep telling each other that it is past time for us to shift back to discussing the spiritual matters which are supposed to be the core of our ruminations here! But then I read more articles in the popular science magazines that I have always loved; and there I come across yet more of the frank brutalizing that the materialist scientific community continues to do to itself. This inability of mainstream science to make any kind of sense of reality is a self-inflicted disaster on a nearly cosmic level, and yet it still goes unremarked in the popular press. That materialist dogma is just as silly, of course, as if scientists were being required to study only whatever rhymes with “time”, perhaps, or to do something else that was equally unhinged. And the sad fact that mainstream science still to this day so foolishly limits itself, does seem to be something that we ought to be documenting for all the world to see! Oh my goodness, my dear ones. Over the whole past century and a quarter, ever since it stupidly handicapped itself with the pointless dogma of materialism in the first place, mainstream science has been unable to find good answers to at least the following three essential and fundamental scientific questions: (1) how did matter originate? (2) how did life on earth begin? (3) What is consciousness, and where does it come from?
There are other basic questions, too, that mainstream science also now cannot answer because of its arbitrary materialist self-limitation that began more than a century ago. But even just these three self-limitations are the most frustrating for serious scientists. And it embarrasses them for us to be aware that for beyond the past hundred and twenty-five years, materialist mainstream science has been still trying hard to figure out:
(1) how matter originated,
(2) how life began, and
(3) the actual definition and the true source of consciousness.
In all three cases, my efforts to Google of course came up with some kinds of answers, but for (1) and (2) the answers given just above were prominent. Now, the fact that question (1), even today, is best answered when your internet search finds the old Forbes article linked above; and question (2) is answered with a silly YouTube that comes right out and tells you that there is as yet no scientific answer to your question; and I will tell you below that question (3) can be very well answered, but not by materialist scientists, shows you just how badly materialist science has failed us all. More on consciousness in a moment.
For my whole life, I have been expecting the mainstream scientific community at any moment to at last simply discard their nonsensical dogma of materialism. Scientific inquiry must be free of all dogmas! And that dogma was first adopted soon after the dawn of the twentieth century. The reason for it, believe it or not, seems to have been a kind of primal panic in the senior scientific community of the day that an unfettered quantum mechanics community, and especially one being led by Max Planck himself, might just inadvertently discover the genuine God. But we find that now, after more than a century during which the mainstream scientific community has become thoroughly used to living within and accommodating itself to its materialist dogma, rather than discarding that dogma as outmoded and useless, instead, the scientific community now simply and pointlessly dances around it. For example:
My beloved friends, the fact that materialist science has gone so altogether off-track in the past century and a quarter is not our culture’s fault! And nor, perhaps, is it really the scientific community’s fault entirely. Scientists still can study diseases and seek their cures, even with that old materialist dogma in their way; and they can invent electronics, of course. What they simply cannot do at all is to make sense of the natural history of the earth, and of its universe, and of reality as it has naturally developed within Consciousness and with God’s guiding Hand. Nope. Materialist scientists cannot ever make sense of any of that, until they free themselves from all dogmas. Until then, their confusion is, of course, because Consciousness is a core aspect and a base aspect of all reality. And we all live within Consciousness, including every scientist, every single day, and like it or not. We live within Consciousness. And Consciousness, as we experience it unavoidably, puts each one of us within the pure Heart of God.
I believe in love, Alfie.
Without true love we just exist, Alfie.
Until you find the love you’ve missed, you’re nothing, Alfie.
When you walk, let your heart lead the way,
And you’ll find love any day, Alfie, Alfie
Burt Bacharach (1928-2023) & Hal David (1921-2012), from “Alfie” (1966)
(Many photos are from Vecteezy.com)
Dear Roberta:
Personally, I accept Jesus and God. I would like to learn more about the life of Jesus and the afterlife. I am bored with the “scientific” blogs. I also accept consciousness as it has been discussed. I am hoping for more content on Jesus and his thoughts. I would love to know more about you and your work with Thomas as well.
Roberta,
Thanks for the post.
The “mainstream” study of science has had about 125 years to develop and solidify a phobia regarding anything that could be labeled as “superstition.” Anything not based in a materialist worldview is rejected out of hand because “Materialism is the way we’ve always approached every question.” There is no room for open-mindedness or curiosity except that which fits in the narrow confines of materialism. This is the antithesis of what scientific endeavors should encompass. If one isn’t willing to look at every possible supposition, how can scientific progress be made? When a scientist says that life must exist somewhere else in the universe because it consists of quadrillions of galaxies, stars, and planets, she is using an argument that given a large enough collection of random “stuff” life will emerge, somehow.
Maybe not so fast. An old argument/thought experiment posited that a large number of monkeys randomly pounding away at keyboards for an unspecified (but lengthy) time period would eventually duplicate the novel “War and Peace” by some sort of numerically rabdom miracle. The numbers argument is a bit hard to swallow, but it’s still being offered to the gullible. Mainstream science needs to develop a way to study the universe that recognizes the limitations of materialism and is willing to admit that the answers probably require a different paradigm. They then need to “grasp the nettle firmly” and soldier on into the (for them) new frontier. It’s probably going to be a bit longer before that happens.
Mark
I agree with Jennifer’s sentiments. I have learned much in recent years from reading these blogs but am not that excited about beating science to death over its failures. Would like to hear more about the fall of man which put us in our present predicament.
Thanks, Roberta,for all your good work.